Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02880
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02879
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Praileau v. The County of Schenectady et
as 11-4211
Plaintiff:
A.M.P., infant, Y.A.P., infant, A.A.P., infant and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Praileau, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Schenectady, a municipal entity, Timothy M. Mell, Police Officer, William Gallop, Police Officer and others
Praileau v. County of Schenectady
as 10-4322
Plaintiff:
A.M.P., infant, Y.A.P., infant, A.A.P., infant and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William Praileau, individually
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Schenectady, a municipal entity, Timothy M. Mell, Police Officer, William Gallop, Police Officer and others
Gallop v. Cheney
as 10-1241
Plaintiff - Appellant:
April Gallop, for Herself and as Mother and Next Friend of Elisha Gallop, A Minor
Defendant:
John Does, 1-X, all in their individual capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
Dick Cheney, Vice Present of the United States of America, Donald Rumsfeld, former United States Secretary of Defense and Richard Myers, General United States Air Force (Ret.)
Praileu et al v. The County of Schenectady et al
as 7:2009cv00924
Plaintiff:
William Praileu, A.M.P., Y.A.P. and others
Defendant:
The County of Schenectady, Timothy M. Mell, William Gallop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gallop v. Cheney et al
as 1:2008cv10881
Plaintiff:
April Gallop
Defendant:
Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Myers and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
