Cases 1 - 10 of 159
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. RM Media GMBH et al
as 1:2023cv01234
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
RM Media GMBH, Brookwood Hospitality LLC, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09676
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Almazon v. Dimon et al
as 2:2023cv05583
Plaintiff:
Doina Rosu Almazon
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Town of Oyster Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 5:2023cv00956
Plaintiff:
Shariff Ahmad Jones
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. and Susan Buzzard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Washington v. JP Morgan Chase Bank Incorporation et al
as 1:2023cv05819
Plaintiff:
Ms. Charmeen Denise Washington
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank Incorporation, Chase Fondin, Chase Ford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nowak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 2:2023cv05783
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Martin Nowak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nowak v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 1:2023cv05898
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Plaintiff:
Martin Nowak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Almazon v. Dimon et al
as 1:2023cv05584
Plaintiff:
Doina Rosu Almazon
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association, Town of Oyster Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
