Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Watson v. Connecticut
as 22-1258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Granville S. Watson
Defendant / Appellee:
William Tong, Jon Laughlin, Dawne G. Westbrook and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Manchester Police Department and Manchester Probation
Watson v. Connecticut, et al
as 3:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Granville S. Watson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Manchester Police Dept, Manchester Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02436
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell v. Macy's Inc.
as 18-1861
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Macy's Inc., Bloomingdale's, Prudential Financial, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association (AAA), Ann Lesser, Esq., Heather Santo and others
Mitchell v. Macy's Inc.
as 18-1504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seth Mitchell
Defendant - Appellee:
Macy's Inc., Bloomingdale's, Prudential Financial, Inc. and others
Defendant:
American Arbitration Association (AAA), Ann Lesser, Esq., Heather Santo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2633
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv07966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Goldstein
as 13-2939
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Winston Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
P. Goldstein, Doctor, M. Borecky, Doctor, K. Page and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
