Cases 1 - 10 of 93
Orr-Williams v. County & State et al
as 1:2023cv10593
Plaintiff:
Frankie Orr-Williams
Defendant:
County & State, Adam Silver, Daiva White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams II v. County of Onondaga
as 23-891
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Charles R. Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
County of Onondaga, County Attorney, City of Syracuse, City Attorney, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office, District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Sposato v. Carey et al
as 5:2023cv00364
Plaintiff:
Richard Sposato
Defendant:
Paul G. Carey, Jed Hudson, John Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dyer v. Edwin Govid/Rising Ground et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ivree Dyer
Defendant:
Edwin Govid/Rising Ground, Lena McMahon Esq., Lynn Vogel Stein Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams II v. County of Onondaga et al
as 5:2022cv01367
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Williams II
Defendant:
County of Onondaga, City of Syracuse, Onondaga Co. D.A.'s Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. McMahon et al
as 5:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Megan Rogers
Defendant:
Ryan McMahon, City Planning and Aquarium
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Johnson v. Jefferson et al
as 5:2022cv00424
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
A. Jefferson, Onandaga County DSS - Economic Security Temp, J. Ryan McMahon II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McMahon v. Judkins
as 3:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Robert McMahon and Robert C. McMahon
Defendant:
Erik Judkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. McMahon
as 5:2022cv00463
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Colleen McMahon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
