Cases 1 - 10 of 615
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03092
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ad Job Discrimination (Disability Act)
Lewis v. Town of Elizabethtown
as 8:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Town of Elizabethtown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00427
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Morales v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv01866
Plaintiff:
Manuel J. Morales
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor of the City of New York Eric Adams, Brooklyn District Attorney Eric Gonzalez, Esq. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Williamson et al v. County of Steuben et al
as 6:2024cv06129
Plaintiff:
Laura Williamson, William Neilson, Mark Daw and others
Defendant:
County of Steuben and Tammy Hurd-Harvey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. Scott et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Phillip B. Scott, Charity R. Clark and Sarah Copeland Hanzas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Campbell v. Taveras et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Campbell
Defendant:
Leydi Taveras, Ms. Kesha Townsel, Mr. Waliek Crandal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
