Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brown v. Nash et al
as 1:2024cv02824
Plaintiff:
Nkosi S. Brown
Defendant:
Dwayne A. Nash, Virtual Now and Harl Dum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. ConEd Security
as 1:2021cv02188
Defendant:
ConEd Security
Plaintiff:
Nkosi S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Nkosi S. Brown
Defendant:
Jonathan Hampton, Dwayne Nash and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Badwal v. Badwal
as 18-827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Avtar S. Badwal
Defendant - Appellee:
Ramandeep Badwal and Jeffrey S. Brown, In his official and personal capacity
Badwal v. Badwal et al
as 1:2017cv04310
Plaintiff:
Avtar S. Badwal
Defendant:
Ramandeep Badwal and Jeffrey S. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tyreek Davis v. Chini Baldwin
as 14-753
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyreek Davis, on behalf of N. Brown, S. Brown, I. Davis and A. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Chini Baldwin, Caseworker, in her official and individual capacity, John Mattingly, in his individual and official capacity as Commissioner of ACS and Amanda E. White, in her individual and official capacity as Justice of the Superior Court of Kings County
Davis v. Abrams
as 14-721
Plaintiff:
Tasha O. Licorish-Davis, on behalf of N. Brown, S. Brown, I. Davis, A.M. Davis and A.S. Davis
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tyreek Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
Deidre Abrams, Noella Young, Dana Dunn, Supervisor and others
Brown v. Web.com
as 1:2014cv00440
Plaintiff:
Alvin S. Brown
Defendant:
Web.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv05878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04799
Plaintiff:
Kemar S. Brown
Defendant:
Police officer of the City of NY, The City of New York and The New York City Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
