Cases 121 - 130 of 299
Myers v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00505
Plaintiff:
Kevin A. Myers, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Semple, William Mulligan, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKnight v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jamar McKnight
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Monica Rinaldi, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. New York City
as 18-688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth Maldonado
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, New York City Police Department, Queens County District Attorney's Office and others
Williams v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
Tyshun Williams
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera v. Semple et al
as 3:2018cv00137
Plaintiff:
Marcos A. Rivera
Defendant:
Semple, Arnone, Cepelak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Krawczyk et al
as 6:2018cv06021
Plaintiff:
Edwin Maldonado
Defendant:
J. Krawczyk, G. Manocchio, E. King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Maldonado et al
as 3:2017cv02145
Plaintiff:
Michael Davis
Defendant:
Edward Maldonado, Kimberly Weir, William Faneuff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuttle v. Semple et al
as 3:2017cv02099
Plaintiff:
David Tuttle
Defendant:
Scott Semple, William Faneuff, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado v. Mandalaywala et al
as 9:2017cv01303
Plaintiff:
Shain Maldonado
Defendant:
Vijaykumar S. Mandalaywala, Nancy Smith, Denise M. Reome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. The Warden Adirondack Correction Facility et al
as 1:2017cv06368
Petitioner:
Samuel Maldonado
Respondent:
New York State, Parole and Community Supervision and The Warden Adirondack Correction Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
