Cases 11 - 20 of 943
Miller v. Kortright et al
as 9:2024cv00469
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
L. Kortright, L. Lilly and G. Jergdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miller v. Osborne Correctional
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Robert Miller
Defendant:
Osborne Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harriott v. Annucci et al
as 1:2024cv02298
Plaintiff:
Albert Harriott
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Kathy Hochul, C. Koenigsmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledesma v. Rikers Island Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
Elias Ledesma
Defendant:
Rikers Island Dept of Corrections, Deputy Warden Mr. Brathwaite and Warden Ronald Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cato v. Westchester Medical Center et al
as 7:2024cv02209
Plaintiff:
Reynold Cato
Defendant:
Westchester Medical Center, Mark Miller, Deputy Superintendent of Medical "T" and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Miller
as 2:2024cv02273
Petitioner:
Juan Henriquez Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Celestine v. Miller
as 1:2024cv02060
Petitioner:
Fritz Celestine
Respondent:
Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilkins v. Miller
as 9:2024cv00351
Petitioner:
Jovan Wilkins
Respondent:
Mark J. Miller and The Attorney General of New York State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Kortright et al
as 1:2024cv02002
Plaintiff:
James Miller
Defendant:
L. Kortright, L. Lilly and G. Jergdi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anonymous v. Miller
as 1:2024cv01360
Petitioner:
Anonymous
Respondent:
Superintendent Mark Miller and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
