Cases 11 - 20 of 20
MacDonald v. Shehan
as 9:2012cv00794
Petitioner:
Scott MacDonald
Respondent:
Shehan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Salatto v. City of Milford
as 12-1179
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Salatto
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Milford, Kenneth Rahn, individually, Dennis Broderick, individually and others
Tabb v. Capt. Rosemary et al
as 1:2012cv01521
Plaintiff:
Zimmain Tabb
Defendant:
Capt. Rosemary, Capt. MacDonald, C.O. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2012cv00289
Plaintiff:
Edward Padilla
Defendant:
Westchester County, W.C.D.O.C., Yozzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Arquitt et al
as 9:2009cv01110
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Timothy Arquitt, James H. Anctil, Terry Ashlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flemming v. Arquitt et al
as 6:2009cv06431
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Timothy Arquitt, James H. Anctil, Terry Ashlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bourguignon v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2009cv00598
Petitioner:
Bristout Bourguignon and Bristout Bourguignon
Respondent:
George Sullivan, Bruce Chadbourne, Department of Homeland Sec and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
MacDonald v. Lantz et al
as 3:2008cv01263
Defendant:
Theresa C. Lantz and Dzurenda
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey MacDonald
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hyppolite v. Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 3:2007cv00729
Petitioner:
Roussel Hyppolite
Respondent:
Bureau of Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Steve Farquharson, Dept of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Foreman v. Brennan et al
as 1:2007cv01079
Petitioner:
Gerald Foreman
Respondent:
Bridgette G. Brennan, NYC Correction, Ingrid MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
