Cases 21 - 30 of 520
Kilgore v. County of Onondaga et al
as 9:2019cv00809
Defendant:
Conway and County of Onondaga
Plaintiff:
Steven M. Kilgore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. Conway
as 9:2019cv00443
Plaintiff:
Stephan C. Ragland and Stefan C. Ragland
Defendant:
Eugene J. Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Green et al
as 9:2018cv01033
Defendant:
J. Hiesler, Eugen Conway, William Hanna and others
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joseph v. Annucci et al
as 7:2018cv07197
Defendant:
Gail Williams, Lane Kortright, Samuel Encarnacion and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeLee v. Conway
as 9:2018cv00935
Respondent:
Eugene Conway
Petitioner:
Dwight R. DeLee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Iotova et al v. McCabe, Weisberg and Conway, LLC
as 1:2018cv02918
Plaintiff:
Antoaneta Iotova and Issak Almaleh
Defendant:
McCabe, Weisberg and Conway, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Conway
as 9:2018cv00429
Petitioner:
Shaheem Elmore
Respondent:
Eugene J. Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Faulk v. Suffolk County Crime Lab et al
as 2:2018cv00212
Defendant:
Christopher Bernier, Joseph A. Conway , Jr., James A. Ginas and others
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Faulk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Conway et al
as 1:2017cv08244
Plaintiff:
Ali L. Cross
Defendant:
Clauide Conway, Sophia Khan, Yan Poon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Conway
as 17-3317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
C. Monin, Correction Officer and Wagner, Correction Officer
Defendant:
James T. Conway, Superintendent, Mark Bradt, Superintendent, D. O'Connell, Sergeant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
