Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Little v. Bellevue Hospital Center et al
as 1:2014cv09790
Plaintiff:
Dawood Abdullah Little
Defendant:
Bellevue Hospital Center and Nicole Charder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. John Doe et al
as 1:2014cv07249
Plaintiff:
Dawood Little
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Doe et al
as 1:2014cv07286
Plaintiff:
Dawood Little
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. John Doe et al
as 1:2014cv05052
Defendant:
Sgt. John Doe, P.O. John Doe 1 and P.O. John Doe 2
Plaintiff:
Dawood Little
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nji v. Talton Communications, Inc. et al
as 6:2014cv06449
Plaintiff:
Njasang Nji
Defendant:
Talton Communications, Inc., Julius Talton, Jr., James Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Dzurenda et al
as 3:2014cv00963
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Little
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Angel Quiros, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Commissioner of Corrections et al
as 3:2014cv00654
Petitioner:
Troy M. Little
Respondent:
Commissioner of Corrections and Wardens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barker v. New York City Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv08903
Plaintiff:
Marc Barker
Defendant:
New York City Department of Corrections, Ogburn, Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
John v. The City of New York State et al
as 1:2013cv08047
Plaintiff:
Little John
Defendant:
The City of New York State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. The Department of Correction
as 13-3630
Plaintiff - Appellant:
John Little, AKA Otis Rupert Resse
Defendant - Appellee:
The Department of Corrections, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, The Board of Corrections, Captain Buttler, Intake Captain and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
