Cases 31 - 40 of 257
Thomas v. Bennett
as 1:2022cv03527
Petitioner:
Roger Thomas
Respondent:
Ms. Stacie Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bennett v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Donald Mack Bennett
Defendant:
The State of New York and Columbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kinlaw et al v. Bennett et al
as 1:2022cv04132
Plaintiff:
Arthur Kinlaw
Defendant:
F.D.S. Bennett, D. Dicairano and Anthony J. Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Ripa et al
as 6:2022cv06178
Plaintiff:
Gerald Bradley
Defendant:
K. Ripa, Michael Bennett, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hester v. Fredenburgh
as 22-556
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Eugene Hester
Defendant / Appellee:
Stacey Fredenburgh, Inmate Records Coordinator, Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, DiCariano, Lieutenant, DSP Cheryl Morris and others
Balentine v. Annucci et al
as 9:2021cv01383
Plaintiff:
Michael Anderson Balentine
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Patrick Reardon, Glenn McGuire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Barone et al
as 3:2021cv01514
Plaintiff:
Carvaughn Johnson
Defendant:
Kristine Barone, Drozdowska, Agosto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. The State of New York Correction et al
as 9:2021cv01208
Plaintiff:
Donald M. Bennett
Defendant:
The State of New York Correction and C. Columbe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vives v. Bennett et al
as 1:2021cv06984
Plaintiff:
Luis Vives
Defendant:
Carl Bennett, Joseph Farrell and Michael Gross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jusino v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Jusino
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Angel Quiros, S. Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
