Cases 31 - 40 of 67
Mendoza v. Jamison
as 1:2022cv05942
Petitioner:
Seferino Pimentel Mendoza
Respondent:
Ward Jamison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Marra v. Quiros et al
as 3:2021cv01338
Plaintiff:
Thomas Marra
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Byron Kennedy, Cary Freston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crocker v. Jamison et al
as 3:2020cv01433
Defendant:
Cynthia, Vincourt Fantavenere and Peter Jamison
Plaintiff:
Shawn Crocker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston et al v. Commissioner of N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 1:2020cv00091
Plaintiff:
Xavier Jackson, Charles Campbell, Ronald Green and others
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS, McCann, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coston et al v. Commissioner of N.Y.S.D.O.C.C.S. et al
as 1:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
Xavier Jackson, Charles Campbell, Ronald Green and others
Defendant:
NYSDOCCS, McCann, State of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Cook et al
as 3:2019cv02012
Defendant:
John Olson, Cynthia Nadeau, Roland Cook and others
Plaintiff:
Ometrius Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cotton v. Noeth et al
as 1:2018cv01426
Defendant:
S. DeGroat, T. Barber, Anne Marie McGrath and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice Cotton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling v. Jamison et al
as 9:2018cv00597
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Jamison, Vanarnald and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene A. Bowling, Jr. and Eugene Bowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adsit v. Annucci
as 18-963
Petitioner - Appellant:
Jamison Adsit
Respondent:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Respondent - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision and Tina M. Stanford, Chairwoman of the New York State Board of Parole
Jamison v. Griffin
as 16-3156
Petitioner - Appellant:
Adam A. Jamison
Respondent - Appellee:
Thomas Griffin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
