Cases 31 - 40 of 292
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03409
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01531
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sosa v. Sweet
as 22-526
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andres R. Sosa
Defendant / Appellee:
Craig Burns, Psychiatric MD, PhD., Robert Berger, Psychiatric MD, PhD. and Christina Carole Wright, PSY-APRN
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Christopher Sweet, Correctional Officer David Evans, Correctional Officer L'T Brian Stadalnik and others
Rogers v. Thody et al
as 3:2022cv00210
Plaintiff:
Wayne Rogers
Defendant:
Jason Thody, Joseph Mauro, Kevin Small and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez Ramos v. Dzurenda
as 2:2021cv06916
Plaintiff:
Jarry Alexander Gonzalez Ramos
Defendant:
James Dzurenda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nimham-El-Dey v. Health and Hospitals Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv08238
Plaintiff:
Abdullah Spencer Nimham-El-Dey
Defendant:
Health and Hospitals Corp., PA Patrick, Dr. Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. James
as 1:2021cv07881
Petitioner:
In the Matter of Davis Ramos and David Ramos
Respondent:
Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Licari v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv01054
Plaintiff:
Randal Licari
Defendant:
John Doe, Ramos, Clemence and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ebron v. Ramos
as 3:2021cv00928
Plaintiff:
Brian Ebron
Defendant:
Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramos v. Suffolk County
as 2:2021cv03743
Respondent:
Suffolk County
Petitioner:
Francisco Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
