Cases 41 - 50 of 459
Robinson
as 2:2022cv03109
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Mickles v. Cardova/Galleria Mall Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv03659
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mickles
Defendant:
Cardova/Galleria Mall Corp., Jacob the Jewler, Rolex Wallaston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Yonkers Police Department et al
as 1:2022cv03333
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Dawson Robinson
Defendant:
City of Yonkers Police Department, Michael Cox, Ian Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Inkel v. Lamont et al
as 3:2022cv00439
Plaintiff:
Phillip Inkel
Defendant:
Ned Lamont and Richard A. Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neira Marquez v. Nassau County Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2022cv01634
Plaintiff:
Jonathan William Neira Marquez
Defendant:
Nassau County Correctional Facility, MC Caine, Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01122
Plaintiff:
John Curry
Defendant:
State Of New York, Rodney Young, Ms. Charvey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Sullivan et al
as 9:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
Allen Rogers Scott
Defendant:
Ann Marie T. Sullivan, Daniell Dill, Mr. Jamie Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dublino v. Biegaj
as 22-198
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark Thomas Dublino
Defendant / Appellee:
Sgt. Justin Biegaj, Sgt. Robert Dee, Dep. Brian Thompson and others
Defendant:
C.O. Vincent Terrana
Crichlow v. Guzman et al
as 6:2022cv06031
Plaintiff:
Kevin Damion Crichlow
Defendant:
Dr. Guzman, Lake, Meineke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
