Cases 61 - 70 of 1,208
Mullings v. Burnett et al
as 7:2022cv07922
Plaintiff:
Andrew R. Mullings
Defendant:
Edward Burnett, Michael Daye, C. Churns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valles v. Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y) et al
as 1:2022cv07870
Plaintiff:
Andrew Valles
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States (S.D.N.Y), Attorney General of the State of California (S.D.Cal.) and Attorney General of the State of Utah (D.UT.)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bahamundi v. Davidson et al
as 1:2022cv07483
Plaintiff:
Gilbert Bahamundi
Defendant:
Paul E. Davidson, Benjamin Klein and Andrew Abbott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Impellitteri v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 3:2022cv01086
Petitioner:
Andrew Impellitteri
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cook v. Martin
as 22-1873
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andrew Cook
Respondent / Appellee:
Martin, Warden and State of Connecticut
Cook v. Martin
as 22-1838
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andrew Cook
Respondent / Appellee:
Martin, Warden and State of Connecticut
Rech v. Roth
as 22-1794
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael Rech
Defendant / Appellee:
Scott Ashlaw, Jeffrey Caraher, Unknown Names of Gore Civic Staff and others
Defendant:
Marian W. Payson, U.S. Magistrate Judge
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv06667
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Williams v. Walker
as 1:2022cv06550
Petitioner:
Andrew Williams
Respondent:
Warden S. Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
