Cases 71 - 80 of 83
Purdie v. City of New York
as 11-2197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Sidney E. Purdie
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, P. Feeney, Assistant Commissioner, Dept. of Correction George Motchan Detention Center, F. Gonzalez, Warden, EHU, F. A.R.D.C. and others
Outerbridge v. NYC Police Department, NYPD et al
as 1:2011cv03843
Plaintiff:
Michael Outerbridge
Defendant:
U/C Officer Shield # 2504, Jorge Tobon, Angus McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abreu v. Romero
as 10-4827
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernesto Abreu
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony Romero, Detective, Shield # 05726, Alfred Hernandez, Detective, Shield # 5046, John Doe, P.O. and others
Purdie v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv05802
Plaintiff:
Sidney E. Purdie
Defendant:
The City of New York, P. Feeney, F. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clover v. Rikers Island et al
as 1:2010cv05356
Plaintiff:
Bashawn Clover
Defendant:
Rikers Island, Knight, K. Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Greene et al
as 1:2009cv05213
Plaintiff:
Dawan Williams
Defendant:
Greene, Knight, Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Waterbury et al
as 3:2009cv00714
Plaintiff:
Thomas Stacy Knight
Defendant:
City of Waterbury, Scott Stevenson, Gary Pelosi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Canty v. Kruger et al
as 9:2005cv01314
Plaintiff:
Moshe Cinque Canty and Moshe Cinque Canty
Defendant:
Frederick J. Kruger, Richard J. Cox, Peter M. Kuc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knight v. Gunja
as 1:2008cv06686
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Knight
Respondent:
Gunja
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hickman v. Curcio et al
as 1:2008cv02095
Plaintiff:
Darin Dwayne Hickman
Defendant:
P. Curcio, Edwards Knight, Captain Chong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
