Cases 71 - 80 of 240
Pizarro v. Ponte
as 17-2508
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph Ponte, John/Jane Doe, Warden, A.M.K.C., Intake John/Jane Doe, Deputy, A.M.K.C. and others
Aguiar v. Carter et al
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Stephen Aguiar
Defendant:
Richard Carter, Justin Couture, Jared Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pizarro v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv04412
Plaintiff:
Jose Pizarro
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, N.Y.C. H.M.H., Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Matin v. Prack et al
as 6:2017cv06318
Plaintiff:
Mahmud Khabir Al-Matin
Defendant:
Albert Prack, Iman Sayeed Afify, James Esgrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. McKoy et al
as 9:2017cv00487
Plaintiff:
Bornallah Wright
Defendant:
Jeff McKoy, Anthony Annucci, Cheryl Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coke v. Medical, Department of Corrections & Community Supervision et al
as 1:2017cv00866
Plaintiff:
William James Coke, Sr.
Defendant:
Medical, Department of Corrections & Community Supervision, Fredrick Bernstein and Morris Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Hughes et al
as 1:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Regan Morris
Defendant:
Albert Hughes, Nicholas Dicostanzo and David Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gee v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv00009
Plaintiff:
Carl Gee
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Cheryl Morris, B. Crehan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. King et al
as 9:2016cv01533
Plaintiff:
Regan Morris
Defendant:
Wendy King, Joseph Carroll and Anthony Annucci
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. Arresting Officer Shield # 900586
as 1:2016cv06595
Defendant:
Arresting Officer Shield # 900586, Judge D. Fitzgerald and Lawyer Glen F. Hardy
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morris
DA Manhattan:
Cyrus Vance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
