Cases 1 - 10 of 292
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, William Tong, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. U.S. Kingdom Hall et al
as 1:2024cv02945
Plaintiff:
Eric Taylor
Defendant:
U.S. Kingdom Hall, ASCAP Publishing Co., Palm Pictures and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. State of New York DOCCS Board of Parole Counselor's Office
as 9:2024cv00399
Petitioner:
William Michael Hall
Respondent:
State of New York DOCCS Board of Parole Counselor's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 1:2024cv00252
Petitioner:
Murray Hall, III
Respondent:
NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. Hall et al
as 9:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Larry Davis
Defendant:
Kristen Hall, Timothy Kijowski, M. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. NYS DOCCS
as 9:2024cv00062
Petitioner:
Murray Hall, III
Respondent:
NYS DOCCS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hall v. Wojtaszek et al
as 1:2024cv00035
Petitioner:
Dyrek Hall
Respondent:
Caroline Wojtaszek, Doreen Hoffman and Michael Filicetti
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hogan v. Hanick Hall Medical Department
as 1:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Michael Edward Antonio Hogan
Defendant:
Hanick Hall Medical Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Baxter et al
as 6:2024cv06002
Plaintiff:
Drevon Hall
Defendant:
Todd Baxter and Deputy Latona
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garvin v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv10314
Plaintiff:
CLAY GARVIN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, CPT. M. TURNER, CPT. HALYARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
