Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Martinez v. United States of America
as 1:2020cv00187
Petitioner:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Martinez v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2019cv10420
Defendant:
Robert F. Cunningham, Luis Franco, B. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2019cv10517
Defendant:
Robert F. Cunningham, Luis Franco, B. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. Doe et al
as 3:2014cv01210
Plaintiff:
Andre Martinez
Defendant:
John Doe and Cruz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. The United States Postal Services
as 9:2013cv00423
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
The United States Postal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. The United States Postal Services
as 6:2013cv06108
Plaintiff:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
The United States Postal Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. Cunningham
as 1:2012cv08938
Petitioner:
Andres Martinez
Respondent:
R.F. Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. New York State Department of C
as 11-4245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andres Martinez
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correctional Services, Jane Doe, Dietitian, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, John Doe, Sgt. South Side, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Defendant - Appellee:
William Lape, Superintendent, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Joan Smith, Deputy Sup. of Health, Coxsackie Correctional Facility, Mr. Killar, I.G.R.C. Supervisor, Coxsackie Correctional Facility and others
Martinez v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
as 9:2009cv00665
Plaintiff:
Andre Martinez
Defendant:
New York State Department of Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
