Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Cintron v. Melecio
as 7:2019cv10867
Respondent:
Melecio
Petitioner:
Jason A. Cintron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smickle v. Ponte
as 18-1038
Plaintiff:
Donovan Bryant, Luis Cintron and Quindell Hill
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Randel Smickle
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Correction, Environmental Health, New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and others
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte, Commissioner, Patricia legoff, Assistant Commissioner, EEO, James Patrick, PA and others
Cintron v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2018cv01619
Plaintiff:
Rafael Cintron
Defendant:
John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Sullivan County Sheriff Department et al
as 1:2018cv00365
Plaintiff:
Glynn Spencer
Defendant:
Sullivan County Sheriff Department, Starner and Robert B. Cintron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv01126
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correction, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jude v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
Steven Jude
Defendant:
The City of New York, Department of Correction, Joseph Ponte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner v. Robinson et al
as 1:2016cv01548
Plaintiff:
Allen Scott Gardner
Defendant:
Dominic Robinson, Robert Cintron, William Cadena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. Doldo et al
as 9:2016cv00095
Plaintiff:
Melvin Cintron
Defendant:
Nunzio E. Doldo, G. Decker, Mattraw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cintron v. Jiggets
as 1:2015cv04145
Plaintiff:
Jovanny Cintron
Defendant:
A. Jiggets
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cintron v. Gettmann et al
as 9:2015cv00542
Plaintiff:
David Cintron
Defendant:
Gary Gettmann, Joshua J. Whitford, Chris DeMers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
