Cases 1 - 10 of 377
Mena v. The State of New York et al
as 9:2024cv01145
Defendant:
Albert Gravlin, Keleher, W. Vesneske and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Mena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaime v. Martuscello et al
as 9:2024cv01114
Defendant:
Daniel F. Martuscello, III, C. Witty-Lewis, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Luis Jaime
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dharamshot v. Lamprie et al
as 1:2024cv00776
Defendant:
Mr. Lamprie, Lt. Petrie, Sgt. Sewastynowkz and others
Plaintiff:
Ravinder Dharamshot
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffee v. Eberth et al
as 6:2024cv06424
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe #1-10, Correction Officer Eric R. Cosgrove, Correction Officer Steven E. Szymanski and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Coffee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ransom v. Cook et al
as 9:2024cv00621
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ransom
Defendant:
Ms. Cook, Ms. Harrigan, Mr. Rushford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weston v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
James Weston
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, James Dzurenda, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierre-Lys v. State of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02759
Petitioner:
Roodolph L. Pierre-Lys
Respondent:
State of New York and Amy Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cameron v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00549
Plaintiff:
Carlos Cameron
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Rollin Cook, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cook v. Mastroianni et al
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cook
Defendant:
James Mastroianni, Scott Meikle, Ryan Froehlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arpin v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Barry J Arpin
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Scot Semple, Rollin Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
