Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Keita v. Konax LLC et al
as 1:2024cv05422
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Keita
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, All Occupants of Park Hill Lane, NYPD Officer "Female" #18822 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daise v. Uhler et al
as 9:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Travis Daise
Defendant:
Donald Uhler, Paul Fletcher, Patricia Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimsley v. Nike Corp. et al
as 1:2021cv10745
Plaintiff:
Robert Grimsley
Defendant:
Nike Corp., Phil Knight doing business as Nike Corp., Amazon Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00093
Petitioner:
Ahmaad Jamal Lane
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fusco v. Westchester County Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv01943
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Fusco
Defendant:
Westchester County Department of Corrections, County of Dutchess, Nory Padilla and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Lamountain et al
as 3:2020cv01364
Defendant:
Lucas Mahaliak, Debra Cruz, Dougals Lamountain and others
Plaintiff:
Ahmaad Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Velasco v. Semple et al
as 3:2019cv00811
Defendant:
Moore, Rembish, Makay and others
Plaintiff:
Victor J. Velasco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valencia v. The City of Yonkers et al
as 7:2019cv00548
Defendant:
Moore, Scannapieco, Moriano and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Valencia and Frank E. Valencia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walbrook v. The New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2018cv08104
Plaintiff:
Robert Walbrook
Defendant:
The New York State Division of Parole, Parole Officer Lane, Parole Officer Rita Balroop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Annucci et al
as 7:2018cv07197
Defendant:
Gail Williams, Lane Kortright, Samuel Encarnacion and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
