Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Baltas v. Cook
as 22-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Baltas
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, In His Individual and Official Capacities, a Connecticut DOC employee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Little, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Baltas v. Cook
as 3:2021cv01461
Plaintiff:
Joe Baltas
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Rollin Cook, Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullins v. Graham
as 1:2017cv02958
Respondent:
Harold D. Graham
Petitioner:
William Mullins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenson v. Hackett
as 16-3619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Edwin J. Jenson
Defendant - Appellee:
Correctional Officer John Mullin, Jr.
Defendant:
Craig Hackett, Sergeant
Mullins v. Keller et al
as 1:2016cv00820
Plaintiff:
Will Mullins
Defendant:
G. Keller, Charlotte Meigs and A. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jumpp v. Morris et al
as 3:2015cv01145
Plaintiff:
Junior Jumpp
Defendant:
Hailstones, April Ralph, Scott Semple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lurry v. Ford et al
as 3:2013cv01157
Plaintiff:
Edward Lurry, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford, Chapdellane, Dzurenda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullins v. Haggett
as 12-874
Petitioner - Appellant:
Eugene A. Mullins
Respondent - Appellee:
William Haggett, Superintendent, Mt. McGregor Correctional Facility.
Mullins v. Haggett
as 9:2009cv00876
Petitioner:
Eugene A. Mullins
Respondent:
William Haggett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Angel et al v. Martinay et al
as 1:2008cv06034
Plaintiff:
Terry Angel and Cassandra Polite Angel
Defendant:
Martinay, Pekosz, Mullin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
