Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Austin v. McGuiness
as 6:2024cv06443
Respondent:
T. McGuiness
Petitioner:
Sean Austin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elia v. NYS Police Troop E
as 6:2024cv06120
Plaintiff:
Austin M. Elia
Defendant:
NYS Police Troop E
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Neill v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01251
Plaintiff:
Devin O'Neill
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Martin, Oles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKeown v. Christopher A. Wray et al
as 1:2023cv05489
Plaintiff:
Ryan P. McKeown
Defendant:
Christopher A. Wray, Joe Biden, David Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fogarty v. Gordils et al
as 3:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Austin Fogarty
Defendant:
Gordils, Bleakus, Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Donahue et al
as 6:2022cv06559
Plaintiff:
Frederick Diaz
Defendant:
James F. Donahue, Christopher Yehl, Timothy J. Carroll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunbar v. NYS DOCCS et al
as 9:2022cv01150
Plaintiff:
Naaron Dunbar
Defendant:
NYS DOCCS, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. Tx. Parole Dept. Director
as 22-2004
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant / Appellee:
Texas Parole Department Director, Name Unknown; Austin, Texas and Greg Abbott, Governor of Texas; Austin, Texas
Henderson v. Popp et al
as 9:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Michael Joshua Henderson
Defendant:
Bryan Popp, Soctt Hamel, Austin McLenithan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Dominic et al
as 9:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Stacy Dominic, Steven Salls, Jr., Gary Gettman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
