Cases 1 - 10 of 555
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00899
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Lamont White
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jean-Marie v. Popkin et al
as 3:2024cv00821
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jean-Marie
Defendant:
Dean Popkin, John Doe, Blawie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larmon v. Queens Berry Correctional et al
as 1:2024cv02191
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larmon
Defendant:
Queens Berry Correctional, C.O. #8413 White, Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2024cv02691
Plaintiff:
William White
Defendant:
City Of New York, Jason Lee and Long Chen
Other:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James v. Martuscello et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Jesse James
Defendant:
Daniel Martuscello, III, Anthony Annucci, Letitia James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00205
Petitioner:
Mark White
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kroll et al v. The Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility
as 6:2024cv06193
Plaintiff:
Jason Kroll, Jason White and Shawn White
Defendant:
The Superintendent of Auburn Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Larmon v. Queens Berry Correctional et al
as 1:2024cv01976
Plaintiff:
Daniel Larmon
Defendant:
Queens Berry Correctional, Officer White, Sergeant Tomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
