Cases 91 - 100 of 144
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-185
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-180
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-182
Plaintiff:
Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Lamb v. Cuomo
as 17-144
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deborah Lamb, pro se and John Mecca, pro se as Sovereign People of the United States
Defendant - Appellee:
Andrew M. Cuomo, the Governor for N.Y.S., Howard A. Zucker, the Public Health Commissioner for N.Y.S., Eric T. Schneiderman, the Attorney General for N.Y.S. and others
Defendant:
John Doe(s), #1-20
Benitez v. New York Court of Appeals et al
as 1:2016cv07205
Defendant:
Associate Judge Sweila Abdus-Salam, Associate Justice Rolando T. Acosta, Associate Justice Richard Andrias and others
Plaintiff:
Carlos Benitez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. United States of America
as 16-3941
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Stritzinger v. Carne
as 16-3887
Petitioner - Appellant:
John S. Stritzinger
Respondent - Appellee:
Edward Earl Carnes, Chief Judge of the 11th Circuit, Lowell McAdam, Chief Executive of Verizon, Sarah Deutsche, SVP of Verizon Legal and others
Doe v. United States of America
as 16-3843
Petitioner:
Jane Doe, LH and Jane Doe, AH
Respondent:
United States of America, Merrick B. Garland, Chief Judge, In his official capacity as Justice for violation of color of law only, Deborah Robinson, Judge, In her official capacity as Justice or violation of color of law only and others
Clark et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00740
Plaintiff:
Clark, Michael Clark, Kathleen Clark and others
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration of Children and Families and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sullivan v. The New York State Unified Court System et al
as 1:2015cv04023
Plaintiff:
Sean Sullivan
Defendant:
Jonathan Lippman, Chief Judge of the Courts of New York State, A. Gail Prudenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
