Cases 91 - 100 of 283
Enoksen v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2018cv06735
Defendant:
Nass Co Spc Invest. Karen L. Lutz, Nassau County, Asst District Atty Mary Rudy and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Enoksen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Florencio et al v. Flor Azteca Deli & Grocery Inc et al
as 1:2018cv06619
Plaintiff:
Rudy Florencio and Oscar Guerra
Defendant:
Flor Azteca Deli & Grocery Inc, Juan Tendia and Sandra Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jean Paul v. Pierre et al
as 3:2018cv01871
Plaintiff:
Evelyne Jean Paul
Defendant:
Chris Bartlett and Rudy Pierre
Torres v. Mc Gowan Builders Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06099
Defendant:
John Doe, Patrick McGowan, Mc Gowan Builders Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Vidal Torres
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Pro Line Manufacturing Co., LLC v. Forty-Four Capital, LLC et al
as 1:2018cv09759
Plaintiff:
Pro Line Manufacturing Co., LLC
Defendant:
Forty-Four Capital, LLC, Francis X Brescia, III and Rudis Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Sipcich v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv01082
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Richard Rudy Sipcich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivas v. Lee
as 2:2018cv05190
Respondent:
William A. Lee
Petitioner:
Rudi Rivas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abustan et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv07030
Plaintiff:
Marek Obrycki, Ralph Demarco, Gerard Klein Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and The Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
