Cases 101 - 110 of 177
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07515
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Santillo v. Pope
as 3:2014cv01451
Plaintiff:
Garrett Santillo
Defendant:
Genovia R. Pope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Griffin (Pope)
as 14-3031
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Pope, Vincent Smith, Cyrus R. Vance and Leon Brown, AKA Charles Brown, Fat Leon
Neroni v. Peebles
as 14-3000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant - Appellee:
David E. Peebles, individually and in his capacity as U.S. Magistrate Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York, Matthew Holmes, individually and in his capacity as judicial extern for David E. Peebles, Gary L. Sharpe, individually and in his capacity as Chief Judge, the U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Raghunath v. State Of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04218
Defendant:
Lois Abramhik, Administration of Children Services, Angel Guardian Campus and others
Plaintiff:
Princess Jashoda Raghunath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cain v. Rambert
as 14-2286
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ileen Cain
Defendant - Appellee:
Unika Steele, Brian Mitchell, Jane Doe and others
Neroni v. Peebles et al
as 3:2014cv00584
Plaintiff:
Tatiana Neroni
Defendant:
David E. Peebles, Matthew Holmes, Gary L. Sharpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pope v. United States of America
as 14-927
Petitioner:
Irvin Lee Pope
Respondent:
United States of America
John v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv01802
Plaintiff:
Orwyn John
Defendant:
City of New York, Betzayda Fraticelli, Tyron Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
