Cases 101 - 110 of 120
Brown v. Kopek et al
as 6:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Brown
Defendant:
Robert Kopek , Utica Police Department , David R. Roefaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kaminski et al v. State of New York et al
as 6:2010cv01399
Plaintiff:
Dawn Kaminski and Marcus Kaminski
Defendant:
State of New York, Oneida County Judge Cook, Oneida County Commissioner Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2010cv01350
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Kaminski v. City of Utica et al
as 9:2010cv00895
Plaintiff:
John F. Kaminski
Defendant:
City of Utica, City of Utica Police Department, Town of New York Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osborn v. Braham et al
as 9:2010cv00658
Plaintiff:
Steven Osborn
Defendant:
Tony Braham, Luis Howard, Oneida County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gordon v. Oneida County Prosecutors Office et al
as 3:2010cv00476
Plaintiff:
Ronald Gordon
Defendant:
Oneida County Prosecutors Office and The City of Utica Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Zavalidroga v. Cote
as 10-492
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Margaret Zavalidroga and Tomas Zavalidroga
Defendant - Appellee:
Joseph S. Cote, Individually, John Doe, Doris M. Kelley and others
Tuff v. Oneida County et al
as 6:2009cv00959
Plaintiff:
Leroy Tuff, Jr.
Defendant:
Oneida County, Grant Gilmone, Barry Donaldty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tuff v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2009cv00960
Plaintiff:
Leroy Tuff, Jr.
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Oneida County, Dan Middaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tuff v. Oneida County et al
as 6:2009cv00328
Plaintiff:
Leroy Tuff, Jr.
Defendant:
Oneida County, Barry Donalty and Grant Garramone
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
