Cases 121 - 130 of 272
United States of America v. Parrish (Laquan Parrish)
as 17-3696
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andre Bent, AKA Dula, Aaron Rodriguez, AKA Gunz, AKA Cito, Sean McIntosh, AKA Slimmy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Laquan Parrish, AKA MadDog, AKA Quanzas
Redd v. Leftenant
as 17-2951
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Fedie R. Redd
Defendant - Appellee:
Zina Leftenant, Jason Zimmer, Richard Samuel and others
Pearson v. Stokes et al
as 1:2017cv05088
Defendant:
Officer Alicea, Captain Horton, Captain Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Parrish (Preston Pasley)
as 17-2380
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laquan Parrish, AKA MadDog, AKA Quanzas, Andre Bent, AKA Dula, Aaron Rodriguez, AKA Gunz, AKA Cito and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Preston Pasley, AKA Smoove
United States of America v. Parrish (Jaquan McIntosh)
as 17-2388
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Laquan Parrish, AKA MadDog, AKA Quanzas, Andre Bent, AKA Dula, Aaron Rodriguez, AKA Gunz, AKA Cito and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Jaquan McIntosh, AKA BJ
Horton v. Recktenwald
as 17-2365
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles Horton
Respondent - Appellee:
Monica Recktenwald, Warden
Horton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv05658
Plaintiff:
Peggy Horton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-2061
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rayside v. City of New York
as 1:2017cv04447
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Rayside
Defendant:
Spennie, Horton and City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horton v. Recktenwald
as 17-1770
Petitioner - Appellant:
Charles Horton
Respondent - Appellee:
Monica Recktenwald, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
