Cases 131 - 140 of 2,093
Sanchez v. 514 Hudson Grocery & Deli Corp et al
as 1:2023cv09838
Plaintiff:
Erick Sanchez
Defendant:
514 Hudson Grocery & Deli Corp, Mina Kandil and Angie Tamer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Sanchez v. Colvin et al
as 1:2023cv09514
Plaintiff:
Dajohn Sanchez
Defendant:
John Colvin, Nurse Five Points Perez, John Doe 1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dominguez et al v. USAI, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv09194
Plaintiff:
Veronica Dominguez, Coni Calixto, Flora Flores and others
Defendant:
USAI, LLC and Rose Moreno
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07579
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bustos-Cardenas v. Garland
as 23-7161
Petitioner:
JUAN CARLOS BUSTOS-CARDENAS, NELLY AMADA SANCHEZ-ZHIMINAICELA, CHRISTINE MONSTSERRAT BUSTOS-SANCHEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
