Cases 11 - 20 of 831
Mendez-Jimenez v. Garland
as 24-815
Petitioner:
HECTOR ALCIDES MENDEZ-JIMENEZ, JOHANA ESTEFANY AQUINO-MEJIA, JOAQUIN ALCIDES MENDEZ-AQUINO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Galindo et al v. Inwood Restaurant Corp. et al
as 1:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
Isauro Galindo and Abraham Cordero
Defendant:
Inwood Restaurant Corp. doing business as La Nueva Espana, 606 Restaurant Corp. and Franco Jimenez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01973
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Perlman v. General Electric
as 24-514
Plaintiff:
CAROL PERLMAN
Defendant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC, GE HEALTHCARE, H. LAWRENCE CULP, JR. and others
Jimenez v. Garland
as 24-665
Petitioner:
DAYVID DE OLIVEIRA JIMENEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Jimenez v. Davis
as 3:2024cv00260
Plaintiff:
Dayvid Jimenez
Defendant:
Matthew Scott Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act - Civil Enforcement Actions
Nokaj et al v. Pappas New York et al
as 1:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Ardiana Nokaj, Lorik Mehmetaj, Kristo Foto and others
Defendant:
Pappas New York, Pappas OG, LLC, Pappas Taverna and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Jimenez v. The City of New York
as 24-323
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUAN J. JIMENEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF NEW YORK, HUGH BOGLE, DERBY WANCCIQUE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
