Cases 11 - 19 of 19
McWillis v. Orange County Jail et al
as 1:2017cv04805
Plaintiff:
David McWillis
Defendant:
Orange County Jail, Correct Care Solutions Inc, Sorrel Feldman, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00113
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Birt v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 1:2015cv07878
Plaintiff:
Frances D. Birt
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation , Aramark Food Service Corporation , Indar Ramesar Nanhoo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Evans v. Aramark Food and Commissary Services of the Orange County Correctional Facility
as 1:2014cv06469
Plaintiff:
James Earl Evans
Defendant:
Aramark Food and Commissary Services of the Orange County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guarneri v. Albany County Correctional Facility et al
as 9:2013cv00853
Plaintiff:
Joseph Paul Guarneri
Defendant:
Jerry Jenning, Christopher Clark, Brian I. Mooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Aramark Food and Support Servi
as 12-1708
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Elizabeth Gonzalez
Defendant - Appellant:
Aramark Food and Support Services Group Inc., Aramark Healthcare Support Services, LLC and Aramark Food Service Corporation
Sims v. Powell et al
as 1:2011cv05582
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Sims
Defendant:
Powell, Correction Officer and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Creese v. Aramark Food Service Corporation
as 1:2009cv00888
Plaintiff:
Hortensia Creese
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
