Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-4258
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
United Financial Casualty Company v. Transport Express, Inc. et al
as 5:2016cv01307
Plaintiff:
United Financial Casualty Company
Defendant:
Transport Express, Inc., Quality Relocation Services, Inc., Autostar Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LeFlore, et al. v. The City of Ithaca, et al
as 5:2015cv01035
Plaintiff:
Unique LeFlore and Cassandra Landes
Defendant:
The City of Ithaca , Ithaca Police Department and Ithaca Police Sergeant John Norman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2014cv01160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ginsburg v. City of Ithaca
as 14-1325
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Howard L. Ginsburg
Defendant:
Cornell University
Defendant - Appellant:
City of Ithaca
Perialas, LLC et al v. City of Ithaca et al
as 5:2013cv01150
Plaintiff:
Perialas, LLC , Pyramid Sound, Inc. , Alexander J. Perialas and others
Defendant:
City of Ithaca, William Gray and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perialas, LLC et al v. City of Ithaca et al
as 5:2013cv01155
Plaintiff:
Perialas, LLC , Pyramid Sound, Inc. , Alexander J. Perialas and others
Defendant:
City of Ithaca, William Gray and John and Jane Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santana v. City of Ithaca, New York et al
as 5:2012cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ramon Santana
Defendant:
City of Ithaca, New York and Phyllis Radke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
