Cases 11 - 20 of 38
McPherson v. Clearview AI, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv03053
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, Richard Schwartz, Hoan Ton-That and others
Plaintiff:
John McPherson
Intervenor:
David Mutnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Twin City Fire Insurance Company v. Clearview AI, Inc. et al
as 7:2020cv02570
Defendant:
Clearview AI, Inc., Richard Schwartz and Hoan Ton-That
Plaintiff:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj
Broccolino v. Clearview AI, Inc.
as 1:2020cv02222
Defendant:
Clearview AI, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maria Broccolino
Intervenor:
David Mutnick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lp
Calderon et al v. Clearview AI, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv01296
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Rocio and Mario Calderon
Defendant:
Clearview AI, Inc. and CDW Government LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01681
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01639
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Melgar et al v. Clearview SM, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06048
Plaintiff:
Carlos Meglar Melgar and Jose Elias Ramirez Melgar
Defendant:
Mojsi Marke and Clearview SM, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv06112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv05298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ramirez-Hernandez et al v. Clearview Tree and Land Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv00952
Defendant:
Clearview Tree and Land Corp. and Oscar Valencia
Plaintiff:
Baltazar Franco and Joel Ramirez-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
