Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01422
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00287
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Ortiz v. Chappius
as 9:2017cv01311
Petitioner:
Edwin Ortiz
Respondent:
Paul Chappius, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ortiz v. Chappius
as 6:2017cv06723
Petitioner:
Edwin Ortiz
Respondent:
Paul Chappius, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05600
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv04630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
United States of America v. Maisonet (Clark)
as 16-4158
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Francisco Maisonet, AKA Frank, AKA Boogie, Jose Maisonet, AKA Joe, AKA Jeckyl, AKA Flaca, Angel Flores, AKA Nolo, AKA Heckyl, AKA Fat Boy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Kerry Clark, AKA Bembe, AKA Big Lips
Robles et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv02167
Plaintiff:
Danny Robles and Edwin Ortiz
Defendant:
The City of New York , Adriano Contreras, Claude Mede and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz et al v. American Collision, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv04940
Plaintiff:
Edwin Ortiz and Michael Serpico
Defendant:
American Collision, Inc., Americal, Inc., Edward Nahas and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
