Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Levola v. Fischer et al
as 11-4253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark W. Levola
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner; New York State Department of Correctional Services, Glenn Goord, Former Commissioner, Lester N. Wright and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Romero, C.O., Bellinger, Correctional Officer Riverview Correctional Facility and K. Moore, C.O.
Cobham v. Inc. Village of Hempstead et al
as 2:2011cv03131
Defendant:
Frank A'Hearn, Esq., Miguel A. Alvarado, Esq., Police Officer Didier Cassagnol and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cobham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hall v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv00433
Plaintiff:
Phyllis J. Hall
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hall v. Bezio
as 1:2011cv00085
Petitioner:
Randy J. Hall
Respondent:
Norman Bezio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hall v. Bezio
as 9:2011cv00080
Petitioner:
Randy J. Hall
Respondent:
Norman Bezio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Villante v. Vandyke
as 10-4038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dean J. Villante
Defendant - Appellee:
Robert L. Vandyke, C.O. and Robert J. Hall, C.O.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv03577
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Rahbari v. Nexcen Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv05695
Plaintiff:
Soheila Rahbari
Defendant:
Nexcen Brands, Inc. , Levine Leichtman Capital Partners, Global Franchise Group, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hall et al v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv04391
Plaintiff:
Roger J. Hall and RJ Hall & Associates
Defendant:
Bed Bath & Beyond Inc., Bed Bath & Beyond Procurement Co. Inc., Farley S. Nachemin and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Levola v. Fischer et al
as 9:2009cv00833
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Levola
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Glenn Goord, Lester N. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
