Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Daniels v. Martinez, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv00918
Petitioner:
Quinteria Daniels
Respondent:
F. Martinez, Jr., Patrick McFarland and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lallave v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00791
Plaintiff:
Virginia Lallave
Defendant:
F. Martinez, Jr., Michael Carvajal and DHO Officer Patrick McFarland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Amanat v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00086
Petitioner:
Omar Amanat
Respondent:
Felipe Martinez and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Amanat v. Martinez et al
as 1:2022cv00095
Petitioner:
Irfan Amanat
Respondent:
Felipe Martinez and Michael Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brady v. Hess et al
as 3:2021cv01671
Plaintiff:
Monique N. Brady
Defendant:
W. Hess and Michael Carvajal
Respondent:
Timethea Pullen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cohen v. United States of America et al
as 1:2021cv10774
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Cohen
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Donald J. Trump, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt
Emery v. Sage et al
as 3:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Sonja Emery
Defendant:
Warden Jessica Sage, Michael Carvajal, Jessica Sage and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mescall v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2021cv04924
Plaintiff:
Sean F. Mescall
Defendant:
Michael Carvajal, Bureau of Prisons and H. Tellez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Reynolds v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv04763
Defendant:
John ? Petrucci, Mr. Schaefler, Mr. Hewett and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Edwards Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davidson v. Wilkinson et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Petitioner:
James A. Davidson
Respondent:
Michael Carvajal and Monty Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
