Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Martin v. Aviles et al
as 1:2015cv01080
Petitioner:
Michael Martin
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles , Christopher Shanahan , Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Martin v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 3:2013cv01825
Plaintiff:
Michael Martin
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Zalewski v. T.P. Builders, Inc.
as 12-5127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Zalewski, a natural person and Draftics, Ltd., a New York Corporation
Defendant:
Mary Paonessa, a natural person, CW Custom Builders, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company, M.G. Healey Builders, Inc., a New York Corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee:
T.P. Builders, Inc., a New York Corporation, Thomas Paonessa, Roxanne K. Heller, a natural person and others
Zalewski v. T.P. Builders, Inc.
as 12-3450
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James E. Zalewski, a natural person and Draftics, Ltd., a New York Corporation
Defendant:
Dalton McAdams, Mary Paonessa, a natural person, CW Custom Builders, LLC, a New York Limited Liability Company and others
Defendant - Appellee:
T.P. Builders, Inc., a New York Corporation, Thomas Paonessa, a natural person, DeRaven Design &Drafting, a Sole Proprietorship formed, on information and belief, in Albany County, New York and others
McFarlane v. Holder
as 12-446
Petitioner:
Michael McFarlane, AKA Michael Martin McFarlane
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Zalewski et al v. T.P. Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv00876
Plaintiff:
James E. Zalewski and Draftics, Ltd.
Defendant:
T.P. Builders, Inc., Thomas Paonessa, Mary Paonessa and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Boston v. SLM Corp. et al
as 1:2008cv04544
Plaintiff:
Joselyn Boston, Joselyn Boston and Joselyn Boston
Defendant:
SLM Corp., Albert L. Lord, Charles Elliot Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
