Cases 11 - 20 of 55
United States of America v. Williams
as 22-2056
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Juwon Robinson, AKA Lil' Cruz, Dashawan Pulley, AKA Spaz, Jaylinn Lenoir, AKA Cheeto, AKA Marley, AKA Beano and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Dajuan Williams, AKA D, AKA Detroit, AKA Corn, AKA Sosa
Dionisio-Orozco v. Garland
as 21-6528
Petitioner:
ESTUARDO DIONEL DIONISIO-OROZCO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Orozco v. San Antonio Bakery Inc. et al
as 0:2021cv02792
Plaintiff:
Luis Orozco
Defendant:
Elizabeth Santana, Ruben Guzman and San Antonio Bakery Inc.
Orozco v. San Antonio Bakery Inc. et. al.
as 1:2021cv02792
Plaintiff:
Luis Orozco
Defendant:
Elizabeth Santana, San Antonio Bakery Inc. doing business as San Antonio Restaurant and Bakery and Ruben Guzman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Orozco et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv01489
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1 through 10, City of New York and Salvator Improta
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Taylor, Devin Rodriguez, Victoria Orozco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Orozco v. CWS Amsterdam Ave, Inc et al
as 7:2021cv01902
Plaintiff:
Jonatan Cardenas Orozco and Jonathan Cardenas Orozco
Defendant:
CWS Yonkers, Inc., CWS Yonkers 2, Inc., Tony De Desisso and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv07055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv11708
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Orozco v. USA
as 1:2019cv06279
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Maximiliano Bonilla Orozco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Orozco v. Intermilan Express, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv08768
Defendant:
JUANIS MUZAI and INTERMILAN EXPRESS, LLC
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO OROZCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
