Cases 11 - 20 of 2,834
United States of America v. Clanton (Shahidah Clanton)
as 24-1429
Respondent:
MARY CLANTON, TONY CLANTON, JEAN MARTELLY and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
SHAHIDAH CLANTON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Rivera-Reino v. Garland
as 24-1378
Petitioner:
SAUL MAURICIO RIVERA-REINO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Rivera v. Osborn Institutional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00605
Plaintiff:
Erick Rivera
Defendant:
Osborn Institutional Facility and Semple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tsuma v. Connecticut Department of Correction et al
as 3:2024cv00459
Plaintiff:
Emile I. Tsuma, Sr.
Defendant:
Connecticut Department of Correction, Bridgeport Correctional Center, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Washington et al
as 3:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Christon Mitchell
Defendant:
Craig Washington, LaPointe, A. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Levin v. Yussouf et al
as 3:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
Jaden Levin
Defendant:
Mohassan Yussouf, Uber Technologies, Inc., Uber USA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Rivera v. Cologne et al
as 3:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
Luis Rivera
Defendant:
Cologne, Warden, Commissioner and others
Other:
Scanning Program - Corrigan Radgowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stone v. Rivera et al
as 7:2024cv03638
Plaintiff:
Catherine Stone
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEW RIVERA and Mondelez Global, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 mv Removal- Motor Vehicle
Hobes v. Rodriguez et al
as 7:2024cv02484
Plaintiff:
Joshua Hobes
Defendant:
A. Rodriguez, Superintendent Edward Burnett, Kevin Fierro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
