Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Siler v. Wong
as 1:2017cv00421
Plaintiff:
Patrick A. Siler
Defendant:
Angus C. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Abram et al v. General Motors LLC
as 1:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Nina Abram , Ruben Rodriguez , kimberly smith and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cunningham et al v. Suds Pizza, Inc. et al
as 6:2015cv06462
Plaintiff:
Adam Cunningham , Alex Chefalo , Remo Paglia and others
Defendant:
Suds Pizza, Inc. , Mark's Pizzeria, Inc. and Mark S. Crane
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Siler v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2015cv00189
Plaintiff:
Omar Siler
Defendant:
The City Of New York , , Mark McDonald, Jeff Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teitelbaum v. Darwin
as 14-101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jacob Teitelbaum, individually and as father to Child A and Child B
Defendant - Appellee:
County Atty David Lee Darwin, Atty. Rebecca Baldwin Montello, Atty. Gregg D. Weinstock and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Teitelbaum v. Darwin et al
as 1:2013cv05311
Plaintiff:
Jacob Teitelbaum
Defendant:
David Lee Darwin, Rebecca Baldwin Montello, Gregg D. Weinstock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
Siler et al v. Landry's Seafood House - North Carolina, Inc.
as 1:2013cv00587
Plaintiff:
Heather Siler and Theresa Lee
Defendant:
Landry's Seafood House - North Carolina, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Flemming v. Fischer et al
as 9:2011cv01232
Plaintiff:
Woodrow Flemming
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Albert Brook, Gerald J. Otis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: CHOCOLATE CONFECTIONARY ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 1:2011mc00264
Plaintiff:
Indirect End User Plaintiffs , Judith Bishop , Eric Rodman and others
Defendant:
Nielsen Company LLC
Cause Of Action: M 08-85 Motion to Compel
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
