Cases 21 - 30 of 64
Wang v. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10936
Defendant:
Ann L. MacDougall, Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eric J. Ende and others
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Crawford et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2019cv00027
Plaintiff:
Neal Cromwell, Lily Liu, Victor Ferrante and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Actisdano et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11504
Plaintiff:
Michael Mcelroy, Daniel Wiese, Gina Tripoli and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Acosta et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11464
Plaintiff:
Beth Kutis, William Acosta, Helen White and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Albrecht et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11431
Plaintiff:
Zia Ziprin, Felix Rene Meier, Chenenne Guevarra Francis and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Cooper v. Syracuse Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Cooper
Defendant:
Syracuse Police Department, David Proud, Erich Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Syracuse Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
Amiara Phillips
Defendant:
Syracuse Police Department, David Proud, Erich Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Livingston v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Livingston
Defendant:
Mike Ferrante and City of Syracuse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Proud et al
as 5:2016cv01140
Plaintiff:
Clifton Phillips
Defendant:
David Proud, Paul Rigby, Syracuse Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Paulzin v. Ferrante
as 16-3238
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilenton Paulzin
Defendant - Appellee:
Richard L. Ferrante, Esq. and John D'Angelo, Owner of DCA Consulting Services, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
