Cases 21 - 30 of 1,321
Ramos v. L & J LLC d/b/a Red Line Auto & Tire et al
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Genaro Ramos
Defendant:
L & J LLC d/b/a Red Line Auto & Tire, Juan Arias and L & J Tires LLC doing business as Red Line Auto & Tire
Ramos v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Jorge Ramos
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer John Doe #1, Police Officer John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramos v. Fordham
as 1:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
Ms. Anne L. Fordham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Cheney et al
as 3:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Ramos
Defendant:
Cheney, Cauley, Scagliarini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Thomas v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv01681
Plaintiff:
Tyrick Thomas
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolton v. Ramos
as 1:2023cv09539
Petitioner:
Eric T. Bolton
Respondent:
Acting Warden Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramos v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramos
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arana-De Ramos v. Garland
as 23-8007
Petitioner:
ROSA DE LA PAZ ARANA-DE RAMOS
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Da La Mora (Huato)
as 23-8014
Defendant / Appellant:
ADALID CABRERA HUATO, China, Arana and others
Not Yet Classified:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GIOVANNI DE LA MORA, ROGELIO RAMOS ROMAGUERA, TOMMY NEPONUCENO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
