Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Hiebert v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01494
Plaintiff:
James Hiebert
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., Edward M. Christie, III, Carlton D. Donaway and others
Shuler v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02141
Plaintiff:
Dionne Shuler
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., Ted Christie III, Carlton D. Donaway and others
Stein v. Spirit Airlines, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02069
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Spirit Airlines, Inc., Edward M. Christie, III, Carlton D. Donaway and others
Johnson v. Buns et al
as 1:2022cv00977
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Mayor Pitts Buns, FBI Pennsylvania, Queen Elizabeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. East Coast Energy Suppliers
as 21-3072
Plaintiff:
Nahemiah Heating Construction
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Clarance D. Johnson, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
East Coast Energy Suppliers, United Nations, Dept Energy India and others
Johnson et al v. Wang et al
as 3:2021cv01627
Plaintiff:
Clarence D Johnson, Neltemiah Heating Construction Company and Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
Jerry Wang, Teamsters, CDC and others
RHC Operating LLC v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2021cv09322
Plaintiff:
RHC Operating LLC
Defendant:
City Of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Adrienne E. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Johnson et al v. East Coast Energy Suppliers et al
as 3:2021cv01519
Plaintiff:
Clarance D. Johnson, Jr. and Nahemiah Heating Construction
Defendant:
East Coast Energy Suppliers, Queen Elizabeth, United Nations and others
Johnson v. Google et al
as 3:2021cv01429
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
Google, Larry Page, Illinois Child Family Services and others
Johnson v. Queen Elizabeth et al
as 3:2021cv01310
Plaintiff:
Clarence D. Johnson
Defendant:
Queen Elizabeth, Biden Trump Obama, Jerry Wang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
