Cases 21 - 30 of 1,247
motley v. JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al et al
as 1:2023cv10268
Plaintiff:
janae rocquel motley
Defendant:
JaNae Rocquel Motley Estate et al, Dymarion Rashad Brooks Estate et al, Derrion Rashad Brooks Estate et al and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01003
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen, et. al., All Contract Rights, Interest in & any Payments due on 50 Membership Units in Monterra Holdings LLC, held by Michael Luehrsen and/or YP Development, LLC, All Contract Rights, Interest in and any Payments due on Michael Luehrsens 10% Class A membership interest in C3 Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
State Of New York et al v. Donald Trump et al
as 1:2017cv05228
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Washington, State of New Mexico and others
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States of America, Donald Trump and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Milhouse v. Hilton Garden Inn employees
as 23-1237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Muhammad E. Milhouse
Defendant / Appellee:
New York City Department of Homeless Services - DHS Employees, DHS COVID19 Isolation Process Responsibilities & Best Practices etc., John Doe/Jane Doe Site Supervisor NYCDHSDSSDHS COVID19 Isolation Site, John Doe/Jane Doe 24/7 Operation Staff/Housekeeping and others
Defendant:
Hilton Garden Inn employees, maintenance, security, housekeeping, front desk clerk et al, John/Jane Doe, Hilton Garden Inn employees until the police bring the defendant in so I can identify them all, Cleaning & Sanitizing Housekeeping Staff and others
James Kilkenny, et al., as Trustees of the Construction Council Local Union 175 Pension Fund et al v. Flushing Asphalt, LLC
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
James Kilkenny, et al as Trustees of Construction Council Local 175 Pension Fund, James Kilkenny et al as Trustees of Construction Council Local 175 Welfare Fund, James Kilkenny et al as Trustees of the Costruction Council Local 175 Annuity Fund and others
Defendant:
Flushing Asphalt LLC and Flushing Asphalt, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Moshir v. Any And All Party(s) Including, et al
as 1:2023cv07778
Plaintiff:
Al Moshir
Defendant:
Any And All Party(s) Including, et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sherrill v. Erie County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv00827
Plaintiff:
Sherry Elaine Sherrill
Defendant:
Erie County Sheriff's Department, County of Erie and et al.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Batalla Vidal, et al. v. Nielsen, et al.
as 1:2016cv04756
Defendant:
Baran, Kathy A. Baran, Kelvin Medlock and others
Plaintiff:
Batalla Vidal, Eliana Fernandez, Carolina Fung Feng and others
Amicus Curiae:
The Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County (LASSMC), Service Employees International Union, African Services Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Raghunath v. State of New York et, al et al
as 1:2023cv04622
Plaintiff:
Ishwardat Raghunath
Defendant:
State of New York et, al, City of New York, et al, County of Queens, et al and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Abadi v. American Airlines Group Inc, et al
as 1:2023cv04033
Plaintiff:
Aaron Abadi
Defendant:
American Airlines Group Inc, et al, British Airways P.L.C. and Matthew Roberts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
