Cases 21 - 30 of 45
Pellot-Castellano v. Arnone et al
as 3:2014cv00684
Plaintiff:
Kenyon L. Joseph Pellot-Castellano
Defendant:
Leo Arnone, Scott Erfe, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey v. Coty Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01107
Plaintiff:
Norman C. Carey
Defendant:
Coty Inc., Michele Scannavini, Sergio Pedreiro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Stricker v. Coty Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00919
Plaintiff:
Eugene Stricker
Defendant:
Coty Inc., Michele Scannavini, Sergio Pedreiro and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Pellot-Castellano v. Arnone et al
as 3:2012cv01518
Plaintiff:
Kenyon L. Joseph Pellot-Castellano
Defendant:
Leo Arnone, Scott Erfe, Edward Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ostrolenk Faber LLP v. Unigene Laboratories, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03991
Plaintiff:
Ostrolenk Faber LLP
Defendant:
Unigene Laboratories, Inc. and Unigene Patent Properties Nos. 1 through 120
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. New York State
as 12-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Dona J. Jackson
Defendant - Appellee:
New York State, New York State Police, James W. McMahon, New York State Police Superintendent and others
Faber v. Biomet, Inc., et al.
as 1:2012cv00783
Defendant:
Biomet New York, Inc., Biomet Orthopedics, LLC, Biomet, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Nan Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv01047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
In re: REFCO SECURITIES
as 11-141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
George Miller, Chapter 7 Trustee for the Eastate of Suffolk
Defendant - Appellee:
PF Saleco LLC, Gryphon Holdings II, LLP, SMS Securities and others
Anderson v. Ramos et al
as 3:2010cv01928
Plaintiff:
Francis Anderson
Defendant:
L Ramos, Ross Faber, Matys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
