Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Abrams et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia et al
as 1:2017cv04201
Plaintiff:
Blanche Alejandro, Aldo Antonio, Neil Attardi and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and Saudi High Commission for Relief of Bosnia & Herzegovina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt Fed. Question: Tort Action
Gomez-Ortiz v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv09637
Plaintiff:
Nelson Gomez-Ortiz
Defendant:
Guy Gargano, Jodi Brown, Mack Lipinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05341
Defendant:
City of New York, Sgt. Daniel Crawford, Police Officer Cameron Evelyn and others
Plaintiff:
Nakia Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gargano v. USA
as 1:2012cv06503
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
John Gargano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gargano v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv04788
Defendant:
John Doe, New York City Police Department, John Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Gargano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gargano et al v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.
as 1:2011mc00153
Amicu:
American Legacy Foundation and Lung Cancer Alliance
Defendant:
Early Diagnosis and Treatment Research Foundation and Philip Morris USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christopher Gargano
Movant:
M.D. Claudia I. Henschke, Mount Sinai School of Medicine and M.D. David Yankelevitz
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2011cv06086
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Byrd et al
as 1:2010cv03381
Defendant:
Dr. Joel Brick, Annith Byrd, Wayne Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Woodberry v. City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv04229
Plaintiff:
Sandra M. Woodberry
Defendant:
City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Gargano v. Rock
as 9:2008cv00859
Petitioner:
John Gargano
Respondent:
David Rock
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
