Cases 21 - 30 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05023
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
In Re:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vera v. The Republic of Cuba
as 18-2345
Petitioner - Appellee:
Alfredo Villoldo, Individually, Jeannette Fuller Hausler, as Successor Personal Representative of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, Deceased, on behalf of Thomas Caskey as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lynita Fuller Caskey surviving daughter of Robert Otis Fuller, as court-ap, Gustavo E. Villoldo, Individually, and as Administrator, Executor, and Personal Representative of the Estate of Gustavo Villoldo Argilagos and others
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Aldo Vera, Jr., a Personal representative of the Estate of Aldo Vera, Sr.
Respondent:
Intesa Sanpaolo S.p.A., HSBC Bank USA, N.A., RespondentGarnishee and Stakeholder/ThirdParty Petitioner, Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. and others
Respondent - Appellant:
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A.
Respondent - Appellee:
Bank of New York Mellon
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
UBS AG
Third-Party-Defendant:
BBVA Colombia S.A., AT&T Corp., Banco Nacional de Mexico (Banamex) and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Cuba, or its designee to the extent it or its designee is the successorininterest to Acueducto Yateritas, S.A., Banco Financiero Internacional S.A., Commerzbank AG, as successor in interest to Dresdner Bank AG and others
Appellee:
William Fuller, court-appointed co-representatives of the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, deceased, on behalf of all beneficiaries of the Estate and the Estate of Robert Otis Fuller, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Citibank, N.A. and others
Intervenor:
National Bank of Canada and National Bank Financial Group
Feliz v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv01294
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Anthony J. Annucci, Amber Lashway and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Muntaqim v. Annucci et al
as 9:2017cv01043
Plaintiff:
Yahya Muhammad Abdullah Muntaqim
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, Polizzi, Lieutenant Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsley v. New York State Department of C
as 17-2580
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tayden Townsley
Defendant - Appellee:
Superintendent William A. Lee, being sued in their official and individual capacities, Lieutenant Mark Tokarz, being sued in their official and individual capacities, Sergeant Neil Yando, being sued in their official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision, being sued in their official and individual capacities
Wingate v. Labombard et al
as 9:2017cv00551
Plaintiff:
Blake Wingate
Defendant:
Brian A. Labombard, Thomas James Hanley, Michael Kirkpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re Application of Zafar Iqbal, Liquidator of Bawa Financial Limited (In Liquidation) for an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding
as 1:2016cv04726
Respondent:
Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation, Depository Trust Company and Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.
Applicant:
Zafar Iqbal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782 Assistance to Foreign Tribunals (incl letter rogatory)
HollyWall Entertainment, Inc. v. Gotama Capital S.A. et al
as 1:2014cv09704
Plaintiff:
HollyWall Entertainment, Inc.
Defendant:
Gotama Capital S.A., Baltic Investment, Ltd., Crystal Financial Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Vinkmeier v. Jaco Financial LLC et al
as 1:2013cv05934
Plaintiff:
Roy Vinkmeier
Defendant:
Jaco Financial LLC, Jack Augsbach, Trinity Asset Services and others
Relief_defendant:
Brown Brothers Harriman and Brown Brothers Harriman Trust Company, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
